“OSUN DESERVES RESULTS, NOT JUST PROMISES” — OKEREKE CHARGES ADELEKE AFTER RE-ELECTION

NRM presidential candidate Dr Esther Nkem Okereke has congratulated Governor Ademola Adeleke on his re-election while challenging his administration to deliver measurable results for the people of Osun State.

Okereke said the renewed mandate represents a fresh opportunity for the governor to respond to the expectations of the electorate.

She prayed for wisdom, strength and a listening heart for Adeleke as he continues his service to the state.

According to her, the people deserve more than political promises. They deserve practical improvements that affect their daily lives.

She specifically identified jobs, security, education and prosperity as areas where citizens expect meaningful progress.

Okereke also urged the governor to ensure that every community and household feels the impact of governance.

Beyond Osun State, she said the election should encourage Nigerian political leaders to understand that electoral victory is not the end of political responsibility.

Instead, she argued, victory marks the beginning of a greater obligation to serve.

She called on all stakeholders to put partisan differences aside and work toward a peaceful and prosperous future.

 NACCIMA Youths Seek to Turn International Youth Day Into Economic Opportunity

The NACCIMA Youth Entrepreneurs are redefining the traditional concept of International Youth Day by placing economic opportunity, entrepreneurship and wealth creation at the centre of their 2026 celebration.

Tagged NEXUS 2026, the two-day summit will hold on August 26 and 27 at the ECOWAS Building in Abuja.

Rather than limiting the event to speeches and ceremonial activities, NYE said it wants young Nigerians to leave with practical connections, business ideas, knowledge and opportunities.

The programme is expected to feature exhibitions, panel discussions, networking and business and investment connections.

The organisers believe that the true measure of youth empowerment should ultimately include the ability of young people to earn sustainable incomes, establish enterprises and create jobs.

The summit is therefore being positioned as part of the wider economic conversation surrounding the Renewed Hope Agenda and Nigeria’s efforts to develop a more productive and inclusive economy.

 

Nigerian Youths Are Africa’s Greatest Promise, Says NRM'S Esther Okereke

The 2027 presidential candidate of the National Rescue Movement (NRM), Dr. Esther Nkem Okereke, has described Nigerian youths as a major force capable of transforming Africa’s economic and social future.

Speaking in her International Youth Day 2026 message, Okereke said the creativity, intelligence, resilience and entrepreneurial spirit of Nigerian youths have positioned them among Africa’s most valuable human resources.

She said young Nigerians are already contributing meaningfully to national development as entrepreneurs, professionals, innovators, scientists, farmers, creatives, athletes and community leaders.

According to her, the time has come to move beyond describing youths as “leaders of tomorrow” and begin recognising them as leaders and partners in nation-building today.

Okereke called for increased investment in education, digital skills, vocational training, healthcare, affordable housing, entrepreneurship and access to capital.

She said government policies must be designed to convert youthful potential into sustainable jobs, businesses and opportunities.

The NRM candidate also urged young Nigerians to remain actively involved in democracy, stressing that their votes, ideas and participation can influence the direction of the country.

She said Nigeria must build an economy in which a young person's future is determined by talent, hard work and innovation rather than birthplace or background.

Okereke concluded by urging Nigerians to see investment in youth development as an investment in the future of the country and the African continent.

“Today, we celebrate you. Tomorrow, we must empower you. And together, we will build a Nigeria that gives every young person a reason to believe again,” she said.

DR. ESTHER NKEM OKEREKE
2027 NRM Presidential Candidate

COURT VICTORY FOR REBECCA: JUDGMENT PUTS EFCC’S INVESTIGATIVE POWERS UNDER THE SPOTLIGHT

Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac and Homadil Realty Limited have won a significant legal battle that could renew debate over the limits of financial-crime investigations in Nigeria.

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, presided over by Justice M. A. Hassan, delivered judgment on April 23, 2026, in Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/830/2025.

The case followed the restriction of Homadil Realty's Zenith Bank account following directives attributed to the EFCC.

The Commission told the court that its action followed a petition concerning alleged financial fraud and property-related offences.

Homadil Realty challenged the restriction as an infringement of its fundamental right to property, arguing that the prolonged denial of access to its funds damaged its business.

The case became particularly significant because the company maintained that the restriction continued beyond the period permissible without judicial intervention.

Justice Hassan examined the constitutional and legal questions surrounding the restriction.

The ruling has now become a major point of reference for the parties, with the supplied judgment account stating that the EFCC was ordered to pay ₦2 million and Zenith Bank ₦2 million to Homadil Realty.

The wider dispute involving property transactions and allegations made by opposing parties remains distinct from the court's finding concerning the legality of the account restriction.

For Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac and Homadil Realty, however, the judgment represents a major courtroom victory and a reaffirmation of their decision to seek judicial redress.

 

Cross-Petition Calls for Independent Verification of Land Title Documents

A cross-petition filed in connection with the ongoing dispute over Plot 4022, Guzape District, Abuja, has placed the authenticity of the property's title documents at the centre of the legal battle, calling for an independent verification of all documents linked to the ownership of the land.

The petition argues that before any final conclusion can be reached on the ownership of the disputed property, investigators should carry out a comprehensive review of every document forming part of the property's chain of title.

This is the man who sold the 
Disputed land to the lady 
EFCC is prosecuting in Court 

According to the court filing, the petitioners are requesting a forensic examination of land documents, including the Certificate of Occupancy, Powers of Attorney, sale agreements, deeds of assignment, payment records and other supporting documents connected with the transaction.

The petition states that the review is necessary because there are competing ownership claims over the property, with different parties relying on separate sets of documents to support their positions.

One of the key issues raised in the filing is the need to independently verify the identity of the individual described in the title documents as the original allottee of the land. The petition contends that resolving this issue could assist investigators in establishing the origin of the competing ownership claims and the sequence of subsequent transactions.

The cross-petition also urges investigators to obtain original copies of all relevant documents rather than relying solely on photocopies or secondary records. It further requests verification of payment records, banking transactions and witness accounts relating to the sale and transfer of the property.

Legal experts say that in property disputes involving competing ownership claims, documentary evidence often becomes the foundation upon which courts determine lawful ownership. They explain that the authenticity, consistency and legal validity of land documents are critical factors in resolving such disputes.

According to legal practitioners, where questions arise regarding the origin or authenticity of title documents, investigators may examine records maintained by relevant government agencies, financial institutions and other parties connected with the transaction.

The petition argues that an independent verification of the documents would promote transparency and assist the authorities in determining the true ownership history of the property.

Observers note that disputes over land ownership frequently involve detailed examination of documentary evidence, particularly in high-value real estate transactions where multiple parties assert competing interests.

As of the time of filing this report, the matters raised in the cross-petition remain claims made by the petitioners and have not been determined by any court of law. The petition represents one side's position in the ongoing proceedings.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had not publicly responded to the specific requests contained in the cross-petition at the time of publication. All individuals connected with the matter remain entitled to the presumption of innocence, while the issues surrounding the disputed title documents await determination through the appropriate legal process.

SHOCKING REVELATIONS; EFCC ILLEGALLY DUTIES UNCOVERED

COURTROOM CLASH SHIFTS SPOTLIGHT TO RULE OF LAW AS EFCC'S PROSECUTION COMES UNDER JUDICIAL SCRUTINSHockingY

Judge's Reported Remarks Ignite Debate Over Due Process, Bail Rights, and the Ongoing Dispute Over Plots 1861 and 1862

What began as a criminal prosecution has increasingly evolved into a broader conversation about the rule of law, judicial independence, and the limits of prosecutorial authority in Nigeria.

The proceedings involving Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac drew heightened public attention after the Federal High Court reportedly questioned the approach adopted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) during the case.

At the latest hearing, the EFCC reportedly asked the court to revoke Rebecca's bail and keep her in custody until 26 October 2026. The application was declined.

During the proceedings, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik reportedly questioned the prosecution's conduct, asking:

"Don't you think you are becoming too personal about this case? Are you witch-hunting something?"

According to reports from the courtroom, the judge stressed that earlier court orders were intended to guarantee the defendant's appearance whenever required and were not meant to justify continued detention before the conclusion of the trial.

The exchange has since generated discussion among lawyers, civil society organisations, and members of the public about the constitutional presumption of innocence and the duty of law enforcement agencies to respect judicial decisions.

Property Ownership Remains a Matter for Judicial Determination

Central to the proceedings is the unresolved ownership of Plots 1861 and 1862, an issue the court is yet to determine.

The defence argues that the disputed properties were connected to May Estate Agency and Famfam Nigeria Limited, maintaining that Colleen Mero Yesufu was neither an original allottee nor a director or shareholder of those companies.

According to the defence, these issues should be fully examined through the judicial process before any conclusions are reached regarding ownership.

The prosecution disputes those claims, and the matter remains pending before the court.

Questions Raised Over Missing Land Administration Record

The proceedings also drew attention to an authorization reportedly issued to Shaka Braimah, who allegedly collected title documents relating to the disputed properties.

Evidence presented before the court reportedly indicated that officials of the FCT Department of Land Administration acknowledged that the authorization document could not presently be located.

The defence argues that the absence of the document raises questions about the handling and custody of the land records, while the significance of that issue remains for the court to determine.

A Wider Test of Constitutional Governance

Legal commentators say the case now carries implications beyond the parties directly involved. They note that the proceedings underscore the importance of due process, judicial oversight, and institutional accountability in a democratic society.

Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac has not been convicted of any criminal offence, and the ownership of the disputed properties has not yet been finally determined by the court.

Analysts maintain that pending the court's final judgment, all parties are entitled to fair hearing, equal treatment under the law, and the full protection of their constitutional rights.

They further observe that confidence in the justice system depends on public institutions respecting court orders, conducting investigations impartially, and allowing the courts to determine disputed facts based on the evidence presented.

As the case continues, attention is expected to remain focused not only on the eventual outcome of the ownership dispute but also on the judiciary's role in safeguarding due process, constitutional rights, and the rule of law.

EFCC CANT RUN AWAY FROM THIS ONE

     

EFCC UNDER FIRE AS COURT QUESTIONS PROSECUTION'S CONDUCT; RIGHTS GROUPS WARN AGAINST DISOBEDIENCE TO JUDICIAL ORDERS

Court Reportedly Asks EFCC: "Are You Witch-Hunting ?" as Dispute Over Plots 1861 & 1862 Raises Fresh Questions

The ongoing legal dispute involving Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac has taken a dramatic turn after the Federal High Court reportedly questioned the conduct of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), raising concerns over what the judge described as the appearance of a possible "witch-hunt."

According to proceedings reported in court, the EFCC sought to revoke Rebecca's bail and requested that she remain in custody until 26 October 2026. The court declined the application.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik reportedly questioned the prosecution, asking:

"Don't you think you are becoming too personal about this case ? 

Are you witch-hunting something?"

The judge reportedly emphasized that previous court orders were intended only to secure the defendant's appearance for trial, not to justify prolonged detention before any conviction.

The ruling has intensified public debate about the constitutional rights of citizens, the presumption of innocence, and the obligation of law enforcement agencies to comply fully with judicial decisions.

Questions Remain Over Ownership Claims:

At the centre of the dispute are Plots 1861 and 1862, whose ownership is contested before the court.

The defence maintains that the plots were linked to corporate entities, including May Estate Agency and Famfam Nigeria Limited, and argues that Colleen Mero Yesufu was neither an original allottee nor a director or shareholder of those companies.

According to the defence, these unresolved issues deserve careful judicial examination before any conclusion is reached regarding ownership.

The prosecution disputes the defence's position, and the matter remains before the court for determination.

Missing Document Raises Further Legal Questions:

Another issue highlighted during proceedings concerns an authorization allegedly issued to Shaka Braimah, who reportedly collected title documents relating to the disputed plots.

According to evidence presented in court, officials from the FCT Department of Land Administration acknowledged that the authorization document could not presently be located.

The defence argues that the absence of this document raises important questions about the chain of custody and authority relating to the land documents.

These issues remain matters for judicial determination.

Respect Court Orders and Due Process:

Observers say the case has evolved beyond a property dispute into a wider test of Nigeria's commitment to the rule of law.

Rebecca has not been convicted of any criminal offence, while ownership of the disputed properties remains the subject of ongoing court proceedings.

Legal analysts argue that where disputes remain unresolved, every party is entitled to fair hearing, equal treatment before the law, and full protection of constitutional rights.

Government agencies are expected to investigate professionally, respect court orders, and avoid actions that may create the impression of prejudice or disregard for judicial authority.

No public institution is above the Constitution, and no citizen should be punished before a competent court reaches a final judgment.

As the proceedings continue, many Nigerians will be watching closely, not only for the final determination of ownership, but also for reassurance that the rule of law, judicial independence, and respect for court decisions remain the foundation of justice in the country.