EFCC CANT RUN AWAY FROM THIS ONE

     

EFCC UNDER FIRE AS COURT QUESTIONS PROSECUTION'S CONDUCT; RIGHTS GROUPS WARN AGAINST DISOBEDIENCE TO JUDICIAL ORDERS

Court Reportedly Asks EFCC: "Are You Witch-Hunting ?" as Dispute Over Plots 1861 & 1862 Raises Fresh Questions

The ongoing legal dispute involving Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac has taken a dramatic turn after the Federal High Court reportedly questioned the conduct of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), raising concerns over what the judge described as the appearance of a possible "witch-hunt."

According to proceedings reported in court, the EFCC sought to revoke Rebecca's bail and requested that she remain in custody until 26 October 2026. The court declined the application.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik reportedly questioned the prosecution, asking:

"Don't you think you are becoming too personal about this case ? 

Are you witch-hunting something?"

The judge reportedly emphasized that previous court orders were intended only to secure the defendant's appearance for trial, not to justify prolonged detention before any conviction.

The ruling has intensified public debate about the constitutional rights of citizens, the presumption of innocence, and the obligation of law enforcement agencies to comply fully with judicial decisions.

Questions Remain Over Ownership Claims:

At the centre of the dispute are Plots 1861 and 1862, whose ownership is contested before the court.

The defence maintains that the plots were linked to corporate entities, including May Estate Agency and Famfam Nigeria Limited, and argues that Colleen Mero Yesufu was neither an original allottee nor a director or shareholder of those companies.

According to the defence, these unresolved issues deserve careful judicial examination before any conclusion is reached regarding ownership.

The prosecution disputes the defence's position, and the matter remains before the court for determination.

Missing Document Raises Further Legal Questions:

Another issue highlighted during proceedings concerns an authorization allegedly issued to Shaka Braimah, who reportedly collected title documents relating to the disputed plots.

According to evidence presented in court, officials from the FCT Department of Land Administration acknowledged that the authorization document could not presently be located.

The defence argues that the absence of this document raises important questions about the chain of custody and authority relating to the land documents.

These issues remain matters for judicial determination.

Respect Court Orders and Due Process:

Observers say the case has evolved beyond a property dispute into a wider test of Nigeria's commitment to the rule of law.

Rebecca has not been convicted of any criminal offence, while ownership of the disputed properties remains the subject of ongoing court proceedings.

Legal analysts argue that where disputes remain unresolved, every party is entitled to fair hearing, equal treatment before the law, and full protection of constitutional rights.

Government agencies are expected to investigate professionally, respect court orders, and avoid actions that may create the impression of prejudice or disregard for judicial authority.

No public institution is above the Constitution, and no citizen should be punished before a competent court reaches a final judgment.

As the proceedings continue, many Nigerians will be watching closely, not only for the final determination of ownership, but also for reassurance that the rule of law, judicial independence, and respect for court decisions remain the foundation of justice in the country.